Discretion is the Root of all Corruption and the Pathway to Tyranny

Every moment Justice is Not acted upon these criminal enterprises continue to violate the rights of law abiding citizens.

Every position in government answers to someone higher. Every. Single. Position. Except one.

Elected officials answer to the voters. The President answers to the States. Appointed officials normally answer to the elected official who provided their job.

Not so with one dictatorial, tyrannical position.

The Prosecutor.

If a local Prosecutor is directly elected by the people, the shroud of secrecy involved in criminal prosecutions prohibits the voter from ever knowing whether that person has abused his or her authority. But there is still, with the right sunlight, the ability to remove a prosecutor who abuses that position.

Not so for the federal government.

From “The Principles Of Federal Prosecution” :

“Under the federal criminal justice system, the prosecutor has wide latitude in determining when, whom, how, and even whether to prosecute for apparent violations of federal criminal law. The prosecutor’s broad discretion in such areas as initiating or foregoing prosecutions, selecting or recommending specific charges, and terminating prosecutions by accepting guilty pleas has been recognized on numerous occasions by the courts. See, e.g., United States v. LaBonte, 520 U.S. 751, 762 (1997); Oyler v. Boles, 368 U.S. 448 (1962); United States v. Fokker Services B.V., 818 F.3d 733, 741 (D.C. Cir. 2016); Newman v. United States, 382 F.2d 479 (D.C. Cir. 1967); Powell v. Ratzenbach, 359 F.2d 234 (D.C. Cir. 1965). This discretion exists by virtue of the prosecutor’s status as a member of the Executive Branch, and the President’s responsibility under the Constitution to ensure that the laws of the United States be “faithfully executed.” U.S. Const. Art. II § 3. See Nader v. Saxbe, 497 F.2d 676, 679 n. 18 (D.C. Cir. 1974).

Since federal prosecutors have great latitude in making crucial decisions concerning enforcement of a nationwide system of criminal justice, it is desirable, in the interest of the fair and effective administration of justice, that all federal prosecutors be guided by a general statement of principles that summarizes appropriate considerations to be weighed, and desirable practices to be followed, in discharging their prosecutorial responsibilities.

Although these principles deal with the specific situations indicated, they should be read in the broader context of the basic responsibilities of federal attorneys: making certain that the general purposes of the criminal law—assurance of warranted punishment, deterrence of further criminal conduct, protection of the public from offenders, and rehabilitation of offenders—are adequately met, while making certain also that the rights of individuals are scrupulously protected.”

The single topic not addressed anywhere is expediency.

As has been the instance in these cases, Federal Prosecutors have, in the 9th circuit cases: simple stolen civil cases from which to base criminal cases that reach far beyond the topic presented in the civil cases. In the 4th circuit case: federal prosecutors have stolen a massive civil case and its counter-claim and have ignored its existence.

A prosecutor should not be permitted to stuff critical national security cases under rugs. But they have.

The background of this site is Lady Liberty with her back turned so justice is not only BLIND it is also HIDDEN!

My career ended in a storm of shadow government corruption involving FBI, DOJ Civil Rights Division, EEOC, FCC, USPS, NAACP and a lot more. I upheld the rights of a black American and have suffered ever since for doing it.

The way my radio career ended has been held inside a secret court (on the docket as ‘in another court’) since 2005. (As of this day October 3, 2020 I can no longer find the reference to ‘another court’.)

While some unknown federal prosecutor has held the outcome of that 4th circuit employment discrimination case for 14 years; in 2014 another federal prosecutor illegally stopped and held my wife’s Arizona Superior Court dental malpractice case due to bribery by the defendants. It took filing a federal action to force that case to be released. But even after having prevailed in that quest no orders or opinions have been published. We won all legal cases but so far, have lost the battle for release.

The post office was active stealing mail in the 4th circuit cases and now is once again stealing legal mail in the 9th circuit cases. Google was used by the Arizona state government to censor the United States Court. The Superior Court case has still not been released. Neither has the two federal district court cases, nor the 9th circuit appeals case, nor the 4th circuit district court case and the 4th circuit appeals case: all won by us and all prohibited from publication.

My wife suffered at the hands of a brutal dentist and corrupt dental companies only to have her case stolen by a federal prosecutor in order to persue a state wide bribery scheme fixing legal cases. The case was defaulted due to that bribery.

In the 9th Circuit court, we sought and prevailed in our quest to force the state court to release the malpractice case only to have the federal prosecutors, through the Arizona Attorney General’s office, commit numerous crimes against us and the court. Now we are stopped from publication for having caught them all breaking federal law.

The person in charge of the criminal activity in the Arizona Attorney General’s office was Michael G. Bailey, recently appointed to the Arizona US Attorney position placing him directly over the illegal acts his office committed. Every single case that man has touched as US Attorney should be thrown out by the corruption of the rotten tree.

On September 21 of this year, the White House office of Presidential Correspondence confirmed in email they had received our letter to President Trump about these illegally withheld legal cases.

The Department of Justice, Office of Inspector General confirmed the first complaint filed with them (dealing with the 9th circuit cases, Google censorship and USPS mail thefts) fairly quickly after its receipt. The second complaint has been apparently ignored.

The Office of the United States Attorney General was copied on that complaint as was South Carolina Senator Tim Scott (the 4th circuit issues happened inside South Carolina and involve Lindsey Graham’s office) but neither one has seen fit to honor us with their confirmation.

While the Justice Department, over almost two decades, has undeniably demonstrated a total lack of interest in anything remotely resembling justice in the matters mentioned in the complaints that have been filed with Bill Barr, Michael Horowitz and more; nothing has happened still.

Whereas the United States of America is a victim in the matters addressed in those complaints, in both the 4th and 9th circuit courts and appeals venues, completion of those tasks would permit our multiple civil cases to be released and completed. Waiting 14 years is flat out ABSURD!

With prosecutorial discretion being nearly dictatorially royal in power and authority; it is not unconstrained. Fourteen years of such ‘discretion’ is not discretion, it is abuse and misconduct and criminal in its own right.

What the DOJ does with the crimes against us and The United States of America is not of my concern. I did my part. I exposed a corruption so deep it can be smelled in every legal venue in the nation.

Amanda Stanford. the county Court Clerk sued by us has been forced to resign. Governor Ducey has replaced her with the very person (Rebecca Padilla) who caught the defense counsel in the bribery scheme in 2011. The very same person. The two Assistant Arizona Attorneys General who defended the cases against the state of Arizona, Mark Brnovich and county attorney Kent Volkmer have both resigned in disgrace. But still no cases are permitted to be released and imposed.

As I told Justice Elena Kagan February 20, 2019 in a vain attempt for judicial discipline: “When a justice system becomes so corrupt that Constitutional rights are destroyed before, after and during federal trials; it behooves those who oversee such criminal behavior to stand up and demand accountability.”

As of October 3, 2020 we have not heard back from the DOJ or the politicians copied on those complaints.

UPDATE JUNE 2022: in Re Lee Kent Hempfling et. ux. was filed via USPS Priority mail Friday June 3, 2022!