Department of Justice Office of Inspector General 9/25/2019

The following is the Whistle-blower complaint* filed with the Office of the Inspector General 9/25/2019

Confirmed by Investigations Division on September 30, 2019

The same day the DOJ entry for Bailey was edited.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has been withholding publication of THREE FEDERAL CASES SINCE since 2017; due to crimes committed INSIDE THE TRIALS. That release decision is under the control of the one man who WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LAWYERS WHO COMMITTED THOSE CRIMES!

As Chief of Staff to Mark Brnovich, Michael Bailey oversaw “an office of 475 attorneys engaged in a broad spectrum of legal practice” as reported by his new US Attorney page. During the time mentioned in this complaint, the attorneys managed by Bailey knew of and or committed crimes against the United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit, as well as committed perjury numerous times in trial, as well as orchestrated the theft of United States mail AND THE CENSORING OF THE UNITED STATES 9TH CIRCUIT COURT BY GOOGLE.

Google stopped censoring the United States of America over ONE MONTH AGO. BUT NOTHING has come of it.

Is Michael Bailey covering up, withholding publication of a massive and embarrassing LOSS by the State of Arizona, in a Federal Appeals trial to protect Mark Brnovich and/or himself. Mr. Bailey has not recused himself from managing the office that manages the cases that are holding Hempfling v. Volkmer from being published.

Mr. Bailey was solely responsible for the legal actions of the attorneys who have committed serious crimes against the United State of America.

He must resign, or be removed from office to at least offer the semblance of proper due process. A case against an illegal hold placed BY THE US ATTORNEY FOR ARIZONA, Mark Brnovich and Kent Volkmer (Pinal County Attorney) and the chief of staff to Kent Volkmer, Garland Shreves; was finished, the defendants failed to respond to the final filing in the case and then proceeded to steal the mail addressed to the US 9th Circuit Court. The Court has knowledge of these crimes as they are ON THE DOCKET.

Attached below is the explanation of this travesty as addressed to United States Supreme Court Justice Elana Kagan from the draft of that document. A reply was made by the Justice.

February 20, 2019

The Honorable Elena Kagan
The Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20543

Dear Justice Kagan,

Five years ago prosecutors in Arizona put an illegal hold on a state Superior Court civil case. As the Plaintiffs in that case we have been desperately trying to stop that unconstitutional act ever since. “There is a right and a wrong in the universe, and the distinction is not hard to make.”

What is hard is witnessing prosecutorial misconduct take on a whole new and dangerous meaning. State and county attorneys committing actual crimes inside court proceedings to further their initial illegal hold of a civil case that started in default due to bribery. State and county attorneys committing crimes intentionally to delay the defaulted civil case and to delay the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals opinions in forcing its release.

When a justice system becomes so corrupt that Constitutional rights are destroyed before, after and during federal trials; it behooves those who oversee such criminal behavior to stand up and demand accountability.

The state case, Hempfling v. CVDC Holdings LLC et.al. S-1100-CV-201102200 was blocked in March of 2014 without a rule 62 stay proceeding. Trial in federal court in Phoenix and subsequently in the 9th Circuit retrial proved beyond any doubt that the case had never been released. No final order had ever been issued due to that illegal hold. The state court prohibited filing anything to complain about it.

As the federal case trying to stop that hold was filed in U.S. Mail (Hempfling et al v. Voyles et al 2:16-cv-03213) it was STOLEN and redirected to an international distribution center. Mail was stolen a minimum of 2 more times during the retrial (Lee Hempfling, et al v. Kent Volkmer, et al 0:17-cv-16329). Mail was stolen two more times after the retrial and after the appeal mandate, which likewise has never been released. Nothing has been released. The 9th Circuit is well aware of these events as they managed to acquire the stolen filings.

During the federal trial someone with the political clout to pull it off managed an arrangement with Google to actually censor and block the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals from showing up in world wide search results. The court is very well aware of this and indicated their own ‘research’ on the appeals docket. The Appeals Court has also stated they will not entertain any further filings making any attempt to receive release of issued documents falling on deaf ears. An appeal cannot be filed on missing orders and opinions. Defendants do not have a right to appeal.

Simply put, the state case is not in anyway related legally to any criminal proceeding and could not have been stopped without the commission of a constitutional violation. The Federal case has been withheld, issuing notice of a final order in April for both a district case and the appeals case of last year but no final order has ever been issued. Anywhere. It mandated the same month a week later and knowledge of that content does not exist outside of the court. But what is known is no defendant responded to the final motion in the case after having been caught in quite a few acts of perjury.

While attempting to invoke local rule 36-4 (to publish the case) that letter was stolen and then stolen again as a copy. Together, these criminal acts are withholding the Superior Court case which was the complaint to begin with. We have attached the last correspondence with the appeals court.

We know a prosecutor enjoys nearly unlimited immunity no matter how horrible the acts perpetrated have been. But we have prevailed in a state court, two federal district courts and the appeals court and not one of those cases has been permitted to be released and published. Not one.

Regardless of the immense size of the state court required award, it should be a foregone conclusion that such violations of Constitutional Rights would not be tolerated. We humbly ask you to stop the tolerance. Please stop the illegal withholding of court cases. It is now 8 months since we asked for publication and 10 months since mandate.

Sincerely

Lee & Suesie Hempfling

About U.S. Attorney Michael Bailey [1]

Michael Bailey was nominated by President Trump to serve as the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona on February 12, 2019, and was confirmed by the United States Senate on May 23, 2019.

Prior to his appointment as U.S. Attorney, Mr. Bailey served for 4 years as the Chief Deputy to Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich. In that position he oversaw an office of 475 attorneys engaged in a broad spectrum of legal practice.

Mr. Bailey had previously been a criminal prosecutor specializing at different times in homicide and sex crimes prosecution. He also had experience as a litigator in private practice, and as an assistant professor at a liberal arts college.

He is a 1987 graduate of Westmont College and a 1990 graduate of the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University.
He was born and reared in New York’s Hudson River Valley just outside of New York City.

About Lee & Suesie Hempfling [2]

The beginning is a dental procedure in 2009. Law suit filed in 2011. Default in 2011. Judgment in 2012. Improper stay of case violates 14th Amendment in 2014. 2015 Pinal County Clerk Amanda Stanford illegally attacks plaintiffs, forces state collection processes for no legal reason and rules case outcome in violation of the 14th Amendment. 2015 suit filed in Federal Court Phoenix. Unable to afford to take that case through the process into the Appeals venue. Another case filed, this time against Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, Superior Court Judge Johnson and Kent Volkmer of Pinal County to force the illegal stay to be lifted. (Loretta Lynch and Judge Soos were dropped from the case to remove the government’s ability to object.) Why the defense from the state was so ugly, filled with proven perjury; why the United States mail was STOLEN THREE TIMES during the District Court trial before the three judge Circuit Court Panel; why Google: using an unconstitutional vigilante service they control to protect copyrights literally censored US, the Plaintiffs, this website, its cohort at http://pinalcosc.us and the United States of America is NOT a mystery.

After the case was completed, final order filed and mandate issued it was necessary to use the local rule of the 9th Circuit needed to convert the unpublished place holders into published opinions. That letter was stolen as well: so we made another one possible. Was that last ‘copy’ stolen as well? We have to wait to find out, but the court put our letter explaining it on the docket (took FEDEX to actually get a letter to the 9th Circuit.)

This case judgment was lodged on December 26, 2017. Beside being the first Internet Censorship by government ruling in U.S. history; the behavior of defense counsel in the clerk’s case before Judge Humatewa was disgusting. The same lawyer, Karen J. Hartman-Tellez did it again in the Injunction case before Judge Willet and then again repeatedly before the three judge Circuit panel and then she quit and ran for the hills being replaced by a clone named Linnens who did it again. The Pinal County Attorney lawyer Costello submitted lies as well, after repeated knowledge they were lies. What started in 2009: with the desire to have no space between two front teeth has turned into the most reprehensible behavior of THE STATE OF ARIZONA and the County of Pinal, one could imagine.

This is the screen shot of the complaint filed: Click it to open the full size screen shot.

[1] Provided by the US Attorney Page https://www.justice.gov/usao-az/meet-us-attorney
[2] Provided at https://leehempfling.com/corruption/case-background/

• it does not require working for the government to be a victim of its unscrupulous employees… this whistleblower complaint is more of a whistleblower complaint than the fiasco implicating President Trump in a Ukraine phone call ever was!

Department of Justice
Office of the Inspector General

September 19, 2020

Open and Public Complaint as follows:

Your department has been sitting on the case that literally pulled the plug on the ‘shadow government’ SIXTEEN YEARS AGO.

I am submitting this complaint through electronic means as I cannot afford stamps and I cannot afford a printer cartridge. Attorney General William Barr and President Donald J. Trump and Senator Tim Scott are copied, it is published at https://leehempfling.com .

The counter-suit filed in Hempfling v. L.M. Communications in the Fourth Circuit District of Charleston South Carolina should have ENDED the Deep State in 2006. After a reverse placeholder order was issued by the district court: The clerk explained in a nearly completely redacted letter. The Supreme Court of the United States returned the filing for appeal without cashing the fee check after three justices took the filing out of the court for a weekend, before it was officially lodged by the clerk’s office (time stamped); where the district court mandated the case with missing orders on the docket while that SCOTUS appeal was pending and before we knew it was all returned to us. George W. Bush gutted the DOJ civil rights division amid news chatter of pending 10 years sentences for former government lawyers. He removed the South Carolina EEOC from the North Carolina district assigning it to Atlanta. He changed the EEOC business model to one more closely related to a law firm model. Michael Powell resigned from FCC, Carrie Dominguez resigned from EEOC. Robert Mueller should have resigned from FBI but that department was deep into hiding what it had done and not done. Then 8 dark years of Holder-Lynch ignoring the case. Then nearly four years waiting on the new administration to finish the case and its investigation while the case is still to this day: ‘in another court’. See the docket PDF attached. It has not changed since its last entry.

That counter suit was supported in court 100% with NO rebuttal or counter evidence. It was never ruled on.

Hempfling v. L.M. Communications and the court were multiple victims of the Postal Service stealing legal mail, even out of the clerk’s office. Google had hidden the case from world wide search at Government direction. The same things that happened years later in the 9th circuit court trial and appeal.

Your response letter to me from the first complaint filed with your office openly requested that if I had any further concerns to not hesitate to bring them to your attention.

With this complaint I am bringing these issues to your attention and once again, repeating what was said to your department on January 13, 2004 in “INFORMATION FOR DEMAND FOR GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION AND INDICTMENTS AND PROSECUTION FOR CRIMES STATE AND FEDERAL”:

THIS INFORMATION, FILED AS A COMPLAINT TO INSTIGATE, INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION INVOLVES THE FOLLOWING DEFENDANTS: A 21 count demand V.

BILLY C. SANDERS
JOSEPH DARBY
PATRICIA THOMPSON
DWIGHT JAMES
LYNN MARTIN
BILL ALLEN
SC-NAACP
EEOC
FCC
LM COMMUNICATIONS INC.
LM COMMUNICATIONS SOUTH CAROLINA INC.
LM COMMUNICATIONS SOUTH CAROLINA II INC.
GESS MATTINGLY AND ATCHISON
Richard Perry, Office of Senator Lindsey Graham
Jean Price, Office of Senator Lindsey Graham
John or Jane Doe E.E.O.C.
John or Jane Doe F.C.C.

Adding former Senator John McCain as he was in control of over 9000 pages of direct evidence regarding the matter and either failed to deliver it as was intended or refused even after suggesting the civil action.

About The Case:

During February to March, 2002: a white program director (Hempfling) tried to promote a part-time, black female disk jockey, (Patricia ‘Trish’ Thompson), to a full time job at WCOO, Charleston SC (an urban oldies radio station): then from
March through July of 2002: tried to hire her back to a full time job, after she resigned because of the radio station’s prior discrimination. Station management refused promotion and hire. Hempfling was harassed for it and eventually fired by the station for agreeing with and supporting her rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended.

Thompson filed a complaint with the EEOC through the NAACP.

Hempfling filed a complaint with the EEOC directly.

Thompson’s case was settled in May of 2003.

Hempfling’s case was ignored, then destroyed by the EEOC in order to:
A: Secure her preferential settlement from the radio station, and
B: Protect the radio station’s license renewal filing.

The radio station filed fraudulent license renewal and EEO forms with the FCC claiming Hempfling’s case to be for a charge it was not; listed an incorrect case number and informed the FCC that his case had not had further action by the EEOC. L.M. Communications Inc., owner of WCOO also swore to the statement that no complaints were pending before the FCC.

A complaint to the FCC for seven rule and law violations was filed with the FCC on August 13, 2002 and resubmitted February 11, 2004. That complaint is now in the hands of Daryl Duckworth of the FCC Enforcement Bureau and has been accessed by Ed Gauthier of FCC.

A subsequent complaint challenging the authenticity of the station license renewal and EEO form submissions was acknowledged by the FCC on February 11, 2004. Hempfling’s case had indeed seen further action as the EEOC Program Manager who handled both cases met with him in August of 2003 to discuss the case, after months of correspondence in government email.

Graham’s office’s inquiry caused an instant contact, followed shortly thereafter by a meeting in a hotel lobby with the EEOC Program Manager.

Nearly five months after the inquiry, Senator Graham’s office, having been asked twice to forward the case to the Justice department, sent the complaint letter follow up (not the original complaint) outside of official government mail to the EEOC Charlotte office. That document contained records of the evidence in the case and witness contacts and was confidential information. According to staffer Ms. Price, in her words, she “used my own money” to send the document to EEOC. Although in public record, former prosecutor Graham should have known better.

In January 2004 Hempfling filed a formal complaint with numerous federal and state officers showing 21 federal felony violations. The Criminal Department of the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice did not look at the evidence (which was provided to all recipients through an Internet secure server) yet ruled the filing did not violate Hempfling’s civil rights.

United States Attorney J. Strom Thurmond’s office referred the case to Tom O’Neill, Chief Division Counsel for the FBI in Columbia SC. The secure username and password given only to Cari Dominguez of the EEOC wound up in the hands of an unauthorized person, who attempted to gain access to the secure server, but was caught and stopped.

The EEOC advised Hempfling that the very person who committed most of the felonies in the case had been put back in charge of his case. They blamed the reason for any ‘delay’ in the supporting documents provided to them. Those documents weighed over two pounds, including a CD with an audio recording and showed beyond any intelligent review that the radio station had committed a clear-cut series of violations.

To date: no other official who signed for receipt of the complaint has responded to its receipt. The office of South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford even failed to enter their signed receipt for the document in the Governor s mail records (according to that office). A cover-up appears to be underway in South Carolina politics.

Now, we are, as you know, suffering at the hands of your department again.

I demand a completion to this disaster. Why has no investigation been conducted when it was so heavily relied upon to make sweeping changes inside EEOC?

Freedom of Information requests (FOIA) were sent to Lyndsey Graham, Richard Perry and EEOC and all three were ignored.

The FBI complaint on the matter was met with disdain by the Chief division counsel and refused to be investigated.

The Department of Justice has been corrupt to its core for decades that we are aware of.

And now, you have confirmed receipt of the complaint regarding the 9th circuit mail theft nearly two years ago, Google censorship and illegal acts by your Arizona US Attorney and YOU HAVE DONE NOTHING!

It appears deep state career lawyers in your department are killing anything threatening to your cause.

Now that we are facing a corrupted election in November there is a very large chance that any hope of seeing justice from any case we have; held hostage by corrupt prosecutors in your department; will return to the same buried condition the Holder department accomplished.

You have had a full color look up the skirt of many federal agencies and their deep state connections for 14 years that should have ended that illegal cabal and now faces once again being swept under the corruption rug just when it is needed the most.

I WILL NOT LET THAT HAPPEN!

For this stage: I demand you do your job; and close these cases, so even if you choose not to prosecute the scores of felonies documented in both 4th and 9th circuit courts the civil cases held hostage are allowed to be released.

I WILL NOT STOP!

ALL pdf evidence files, audio files and documentation is located publicly at https://leehempfling.com/fourth-circuit-all-case-files-archive-collection/

The NAACP’s backdoor to the EEOC documents email content and records: https://leehempfling.com/legal/fourth-circuit-case/the-naacps-back-door-to-the-eeoc/

The FBI Cover up : https://leehempfling.com/legal/corruption/south-carolina-fbi-field-office-covers-up-federal-offenses-in-race-based-direct-action-case/

Rollovermartin the first three chapters explaining how it got that far: https://leehempfling.com/legal/corruption/rollover-martin/

Detailed explanation with documents from US DOJ, EEOC, US Attorney etc. https://leehempfling.com/legal/fourth-circuit-case/what-deep-state-national-security-threat-ended-my-radio-career/

Included in the file with this complaint are two Lyndsey Graham response letters, the FBI Complaint, three notices of FOIA filings, the 21 Count demand for prosecution and the 4th circuit district court docket from December 2017. This Zip file is located at https://leehempfling.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Hempfling_Complaint_files.zip .

https://leehempfling.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/district_court_docket_121907.pdf
https://leehempfling.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/FBI-Complaint-3.pdf
https://leehempfling.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/graham_response_2.pdf
https://leehempfling.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/graham_response_1.pdf
https://leehempfling.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/INFORMATION-FOR-DEMAND-FOR-GRAND-JURY-INVESTIGATION-AND.pdf
https://leehempfling.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/perry_foia.pdf
https://leehempfling.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/foia_graham.pdf
https://leehempfling.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/foia_eeoc.pdf

Once again, I will await your investigative division response, for what good it may be worth. But I will NOT wait one moment longer.

With utmost sincerity;

__________________________
Lee Kent Hempfling
XXXX
Apache Junction, AZ 85120
https://leehempfling.com
XXXX
XXXX
I do not own a cell phone do not attempt text.

UPDATE

This morning 3/8/2021 I received the following two responses frOM, the OIG CIGIE. That is actually the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency. It was not submitted to them. It was submitted to the DOJ OIG through their online complaint form.

Received today was:

First is a rejection of the complaint about a FBI chief counsel that the OIG claims they do not have jurisdiction over and to go to the EEOC/OIG which has nothing to do with this complaint.

The it was followed one minute later with a statement of recall of that message , whatever that means.

Dear Concerned Citizen:

The purpose of this letter is to acknowledge receipt of your correspondence. The matters that you raised have been reviewed by the staff of the Investigations Division, Office of the Inspector General.

The primary investigative responsibilities of this office are:

• Allegations of misconduct committed by U.S. Department of Justice employees and contractors; and

• Waste and abuse by high ranking Department officials, or that affects major programs and operations.

This Office does not have jurisdiction in the matter you described. Therefore, we are unable to assist you.

Please contact EEOC/OIG for further assistance.

We regret that we are unable to assist you further.

Sincerely,

Office of the Inspector General

 

Original complaint in their records:

From: noreply@cigie.gov <noreply@cigie.gov>
Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2020 1:06 PM
To: OIG CIGIE (OIG) <ocigie@OIG.USDOJ.GOV>
Subject: Webform submission from: Employee or Program Complaint

 

Submitted on Sat, 09/19/2020 – 13:02

Submitted by: Anonymous

Submitted values are:
Complainant Information

Submit complaint anonymously
No
Complainant Information

Your Name
Lee Kent Hempfling, Lee K Hempfling

Your Email

Your Address
XXXX
APACHE JUNCTION, Arizona. 85120
United States

Your Phone
XXXX

Your Year of Birth
1952

Last four digits of your SSN
xxxx
Subject Information
Subject Information

Name
Tom O’Neil

Subject Component
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

Subject Job Title
Chief Division Counsel

Subject Address
Columbia, South Carolina
United States
Complaint Details
Complaint Description

Details:
Department of Justice
Office of the Inspector General

September 19, 2020

Open and Public Complaint as follows:

Your department has been sitting on the case that literally pulled the plug on the ‘shadow government’ SIXTEEN YEARS AGO.

I am submitting this complaint through electronic means as I cannot afford stamps and I cannot afford a printer cartridge. Attorney General William Barr and President Donald J. Trump and Senator Tim Scott are copied, it is published at https://leehempfling.com .

The counter-suit filed in Hempfling v. L.M. Communications in the Fourth Circuit District of Charleston South Carolina should have ENDED the Deep State in 2006. After a reverse placeholder order was issued by the district court: The clerk explained in a nearly completely redacted letter. The Supreme Court of the United States returned the filing for appeal without cashing the fee check after three justices took the filing out of the court for a weekend, before it was officially lodged by the clerk’s office (time stamped); where the district court mandated the case with missing orders on the docket while that SCOTUS appeal was pending and before we knew it was all returned to us. George W. Bush gutted the DOJ civil rights division amid news chatter of pending 10 years sentences for former government lawyers. He removed the South Carolina EEOC from the North Carolina district assigning it to Atlanta. He changed the EEOC business model to one more closely related to a law firm model. Michael Powell resigned from FCC, Carrie Dominguez resigned from EEOC. Robert Mueller should have resigned from FBI but that department was deep into hiding what it had done and not done. Then 8 dark years of Holder-Lynch ignoring the case. Then nearly four years waiting on the new administration to finish the case and its investigation while the case is still to this day: ‘in another court’. See the docket PDF attached. It has not changed since its last entry.

That counter suit was supported in court 100% with NO rebuttal or counter evidence. It was never ruled on.

Hempfling v. L.M. Communications and the court were multiple victims of the Postal Service stealing legal mail, even out of the clerk’s office. Google had hidden the case from world wide search at Government direction. The same things that happened years later in the 9th circuit court trial and appeal.

Your response letter to me from the first complaint filed with your office openly requested that if I had any further concerns to not hesitate to bring them to your attention.

With this complaint I am bringing these issues to your attention and once again, repeating what was said to your department on January 13, 2004 in “INFORMATION FOR DEMAND FOR GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION AND INDICTMENTS AND PROSECUTION FOR CRIMES STATE AND FEDERAL”:

THIS INFORMATION, FILED AS A COMPLAINT TO INSTIGATE, INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION INVOLVES THE FOLLOWING DEFENDANTS: A 21 count demand V.

BILLY C. SANDERS
JOSEPH DARBY
PATRICIA THOMPSON
DWIGHT JAMES
LYNN MARTIN
BILL ALLEN
SC-NAACP
EEOC
FCC
LM COMMUNICATIONS INC.
LM COMMUNICATIONS SOUTH CAROLINA INC.
LM COMMUNICATIONS SOUTH CAROLINA II INC.
GESS MATTINGLY AND ATCHISON
Richard Perry, Office of Senator Lindsey Graham
Jean Price, Office of Senator Lindsey Graham
John or Jane Doe E.E.O.C.
John or Jane Doe F.C.C.

Adding former Senator John McCain as he was in control of over 9000 pages of direct evidence regarding the matter and either failed to deliver it as was intended or refused even after suggesting the civil action.

About The Case:

During February to March, 2002: a white program director (Hempfling) tried to promote a part-time, black female disk jockey, (Patricia ‘Trish’ Thompson), to a full time job at WCOO, Charleston SC (an urban oldies radio station): then from
March through July of 2002: tried to hire her back to a full time job, after she resigned because of the radio station’s prior discrimination. Station management refused promotion and hire. Hempfling was harassed for it and eventually fired by the station for agreeing with and supporting her rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended.

Thompson filed a complaint with the EEOC through the NAACP.

Hempfling filed a complaint with the EEOC directly.

Thompson’s case was settled in May of 2003.

Hempfling’s case was ignored, then destroyed by the EEOC in order to:
A: Secure her preferential settlement from the radio station, and
B: Protect the radio station’s license renewal filing.

The radio station filed fraudulent license renewal and EEO forms with the FCC claiming Hempfling’s case to be for a charge it was not; listed an incorrect case number and informed the FCC that his case had not had further action by the EEOC. L.M. Communications Inc., owner of WCOO also swore to the statement that no complaints were pending before the FCC.

A complaint to the FCC for seven rule and law violations was filed with the FCC on August 13, 2002 and resubmitted February 11, 2004. That complaint is now in the hands of Daryl Duckworth of the FCC Enforcement Bureau and has been accessed by Ed Gauthier of FCC.

A subsequent complaint challenging the authenticity of the station license renewal and EEO form submissions was acknowledged by the FCC on February 11, 2004. Hempfling’s case had indeed seen further action as the EEOC Program Manager who handled both cases met with him in August of 2003 to discuss the case, after months of correspondence in government email.

Graham’s office’s inquiry caused an instant contact, followed shortly thereafter by a meeting in a hotel lobby with the EEOC Program Manager.

Nearly five months after the inquiry, Senator Graham’s office, having been asked twice to forward the case to the Justice department, sent the complaint letter follow up (not the original complaint) outside of official government mail to the EEOC Charlotte office. That document contained records of the evidence in the case and witness contacts and was confidential information. According to staffer Ms. Price, in her words, she “used my own money” to send the document to EEOC. Although in public record, former prosecutor Graham should have known better.

In January 2004 Hempfling filed a formal complaint with numerous federal and state officers showing 21 federal felony violations. The Criminal Department of the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice did not look at the evidence (which was provided to all recipients through an Internet secure server) yet ruled the filing did not violate Hempfling’s civil rights.

United States Attorney J. Strom Thurmond’s office referred the case to Tom O’Neill, Chief Division Counsel for the FBI in Columbia SC. The secure username and password given only to Cari Dominguez of the EEOC wound up in the hands of an unauthorized person, who attempted to gain access to the secure server, but was caught and stopped.

The EEOC advised Hempfling that the very person who committed most of the felonies in the case had been put back in charge of his case. They blamed the reason for any ‘delay’ in the supporting documents provided to them. Those documents weighed over two pounds, including a CD with an audio recording and showed beyond any intelligent review that the radio station had committed a clear-cut series of violations.

To date: no other official who signed for receipt of the complaint has responded to its receipt. The office of South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford even failed to enter their signed receipt for the document in the Governor s mail records (according to that office). A cover-up appears to be underway in South Carolina politics.

Now, we are, as you know, suffering at the hands of your department again.

I demand a completion to this disaster. Why has no investigation been conducted when it was so heavily relied upon to make sweeping changes inside EEOC?

Freedom of Information requests (FOIA) were sent to Lyndsey Graham, Richard Perry and EEOC and all three were ignored.

The FBI complaint on the matter was met with disdain by the Chief division counsel and refused to be investigated.

The Department of Justice has been corrupt to its core for decades that we are aware of.

And now, you have confirmed receipt of the complaint regarding the 9th circuit mail theft nearly two years ago, Google censorship and illegal acts by your Arizona US Attorney and YOU HAVE DONE NOTHING!

It appears deep state career lawyers in your department are killing anything threatening to your cause.

Now that we are facing a corrupted election in November there is a very large chance that any hope of seeing justice from any case we have; held hostage by corrupt prosecutors in your department; will return to the same buried condition the Holder department accomplished.

You have had a full color look up the skirt of many federal agencies and their deep state connections for 14 years that should have ended that illegal cabal and now faces once again being swept under the corruption rug just when it is needed the most.

I WILL NOT LET THAT HAPPEN!

For this stage: I demand you do your job; and close these cases, so even if you choose not to prosecute the scores of felonies documented in both 4th and 9th circuit courts the civil cases held hostage are allowed to be released.

I WILL NOT STOP!

ALL pdf evidence files, audio files and documentation is located publicly at https://leehempfling.com/fourth-circuit-all-case-files-archive-collection/

The NAACP’s backdoor to the EEOC documents email content and records: https://leehempfling.com/legal/fourth-circuit-case/the-naacps-back-door-to-the-eeoc/

The FBI Cover up : https://leehempfling.com/legal/corruption/south-carolina-fbi-field-office-covers-up-federal-offenses-in-race-based-direct-action-case/

Rollovermartin the first three chapters explaining how it got that far: https://leehempfling.com/legal/corruption/rollover-martin/

Detailed explanation with documents from US DOJ, EEOC, US Attorney etc. https://leehempfling.com/legal/fourth-circuit-case/what-deep-state-national-security-threat-ended-my-radio-career/

Included in the file with this complaint are two Lyndsey Graham response letters, the FBI Complaint, three notices of FOIA filings, the 21 Count demand for prosecution and the 4th circuit district court docket from December 2017. This Zip file is located at https://leehempfling.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Hempfling_Complaint_files.zip .

Once again, I will await your investigative division response, for what good it may be worth. But I will NOT wait one moment longer.

With utmost sincerity;

__________________________
Lee Kent Hempfling
xxxx
Apache Junction, AZ 85120
https://leehempfling.com
xxxx
xxxx

Complaint Details

Where did the incident occurred?
Charleston , South Carolina

Date and time the incident occurred
Tue, 08/13/2002 – 13:06

Is the activity ongoing
Yes

Did the incident occur at a prison or holding facility?
No

Is this a civil rights violation?
Yes

Is this an insider threat?
No

---

At least they determined it is an ongoing problem.

THEN…

---

One minute later this came:

OIG CIGIE (OIG) would like to recall the message, “Webform submission from: Employee or Program Complaint”.

---

So.. that normally means they changed their minds. But no evidence they have one as of yet.

UPDATE 2 3/15/21: Then, a week later after recalling their response they sent this:

BTW I was not a ‘concerned citizen’. I was filing official complaints.

Dear Concerned Citizen:

The purpose of this letter is to acknowledge receipt of your correspondence.  The matters that you raised have been reviewed by the staff of the Investigations Division, Office of the Inspector General.

The primary investigative responsibilities of this office are:

• Allegations of misconduct committed by U.S. Department of Justice employees and contractors; and
• Waste and abuse by high ranking Department officials, or that affects major programs and operations.

This Office does not have jurisdiction in the matter you described.  Therefore, we are unable to assist you.

We regret that we are unable to assist you further.

Sincerely,

Office of the Inspector General

The matter described was illegal activity by the chief counsel of the South Carolina FBI Office. They even named it after the man.

Subject Information

Name
Tom O’Neil

Subject Component
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

Subject Job Title
Chief Division Counsel

Subject Address
Columbia, South Carolina
United States

The OIG has still not responded to the 9th Circuit complaints. The EEOC has still not complied with FOIA.